Like a Dead, Bloated Pig Erupting in the Noon Sun


The article I have posted is from February of 2005, but I feel it still has relevance. She was visiting with East Indian politicians and industrialists. Why was she meeting with them you ask? Doesn't a senator meet with constituents of her own state and country? It is the old question of if your lover isn't sleeping with you then who is she or he sleeping with? In addition her meeting with these Indian dignitaries was kept secret. She had a posse of 11 Secret Service agents. The article I found was in an Indian newspaper. She knew her whole agenda would smell like a road killed, bloated pig erupting in the mid day sun. She is working with global elites to take away your middle class jobs. All the while she smiles like a sumptuous, obliging whore.

Secret Low Profile Hillary visits with Indian Plutocrats

Hillary Clinton in New Delhi – plans to meet the very inner core of Indian politicians and industrialists
Sudhir Chadda
Feb. 26, 2005


People who run India have quietly put a real red carpet for Hillary Clinton as she visits New Delhi. The top politicians and industrialists have started building a very special informal relationship with the former First Lady of America who is also the most probable next President of United States.

US Senator Hillary Clinton, who is on a three-day private visit to India, kept a low profile on the first day of her trip here on Thursday. New York-based Indian American hotelier Sant Chatwal, Hillary's host, did not divulge details of her capital visit.

"Jobs for New York" Scam, Ultra New Weapons from Carlyle Group







Hillary's "Jobs for New York" has been exposed as a meetup with various Carlyle Group executives, Wall Street portolio managers, and various military contractors. Steven Greenfield is running against Hillary Clinton in the Democratic primary. I have to praise him for putting up a valiant campaign against her. The New York media ignores progressive candidates against Machine Hillary. Could it be they remember husband Bill's help with the communications bill during the 90's? Keep in mind that New Yorkers and American citizens have little hope for a peaceful planet and a prosperous future as long as war hawk politicians like Hillary stay in high office. We must make it painful for Democratic politicians to adhere to the Scoop Jackson hardline. No more spending the sweat of the nation for these weapons, while destroying the productivity of our population for consumer goods. It is as if we are reproducing an economy on the scale of the old Soviet Union. In Eric Blair's 1984,the idea was put forth that the comfort and the prosperity of the people would be clamped down, so that resources could be diverted to military spending. This structure kept the population uncultured and enslaved. There were not enough resources to keep citizens
well housed and well fed; these resources were used for the latest and greatest military technologies. A democratic republic cannot exist within a garrison state.

JustHillary.com


JustHillary.com interviews Steve Greenfield


JH: Do you think Sen. Clinton should run for president?

SG: What a complex question, seemingly so simple. I think Hillary would be a terrible president, so in that sense I'd prefer that she not run. On the other hand, I'm positive she couldn't possibly win, and the 50 to 100 million dollars she'd spend in the primaries would be a serious economic stimulus that would create a lot of employment. On the other hand, I'd rather see that money going to a decent candidate or better yet, to feed hungry people or buy two year's worth of health insurance for the uninsured, so again, I'd rather she not run, but people are donating that money to Hillary of their own free will and there's no doubt that, sadly, they expect her to spend it on herself rather than on anything that will do good for the world, and that she's happy to oblige.

JH: Would you support her if she did?

SG: I would oppose her with every ounce of my energy.

JH: Have you been making much use of the internet in your campaign? Is the web useful for an insurgent candidate like yourself who is running against the party organization?

SG: I have not been exploiting the power of the web as much as I should. It is a very useful tool, and I have to step up my efforts in that area. To the degree I have been using the web it has been extremely successful.

JH: How do you expect to get your name on the ballot in September?

SG: My campaign volunteers will carry petitions.

JH: You won't have enough money to collect signatures by going the petition route and the state party won't give you a place on the ballot.

SG: It doesn't take money to petition, just people. A properly formatted blank petition can be sent to volunteers as an email attachment, or downloaded from the campaign website. And it's not as hard as you may think to get the required signatures. The 15,000 signature requirement translates into 150 volunteers being able to get just 100 signatures each. That could be done in two afternoons in front of a supermarket or post office. Of course, you build some protection against a petition challenge by going beyond the minimum, but the point is, it's not that hard, and not expensive.

JH: Why did you decide to confront Sen. Clinton in Albany last Friday and do you plan more of that?

SG: Upon entering the ballroom where the luncheon was being held, I discovered that the event had nothing to do with "Jobs for New York" as it had been billed. One of the panelists was a former Clinton Administration official and current top executive of the Carlyle Group, the nation's largest military-industrial contractor (aka merchants of death) whose directorship is a who's who of former top Democrat, Republican, and British administration officials. The others were from other top military contractors and investment portfolios. The marquee name and moderator was none other than a Senator who reliably casts votes that borrow vast amounts of money from my children to the profit of her panelists and the deaths of tens of thousands of innocent people. Unsurprisingly, they are also her most reliable campaign donors. Quite frankly, after watching a few minutes of their cozy love-fest, my blood began to boil, as any decent person's would. It was impossible to contain myself. While the voices of war were being so pleasantly and royally heeded, it became necessary that a lone voice of peace rise above and be heard.

I plan to confront Hillary at every possible opportunity.

More Outsourcing Hijinks from Hijacker Hillary


Shame, shame! Bartcop. You will not disclose Hillary Clinton's jobs exporting program for the state of New York. I have lived in the Buffalo area. It has been a city in decline for a long time. Being that it is downwind from Niagra Falls, New York, Beau Fleuve got all the infernal exhalations of that industrial furnace town without any of the benefits. Luckily, Niagra Falls is just a cemetry of brownfields now. The ghosts of children, killed off by industrial diseases, wander its doomsday landscapes. As for Buffalo, it has been mainly a bakery town for the rest of the east coast. High tech was supposed to be Buffalo's salvation with clean jobs in code development.


Hillary has played more like the evil stepmother, who sends her unloved young charges into the coal mines for a few dirty coppers. You are supposed to represent New York's citizens, Hillary, not Tata Consulting!! TaTa Consulting Services gets 65% of its revenues from its North American operations. Those are revenues that leave the country. TaTa also gets a share of all technolgy patent fees generated at American universities. Not only that, but TaTa is a consortium of companies in such areas as auto components to cell phone networks. Why are we making touchdowns for the other side?

Hillary claims that the arrangement will create jobs in the Buffalo area. You believe her, right? Look at NAFTA as approved by her husband back in the 90's. Stop believing the lies!



Corporate partner

BuffLink

Firm will look to UB for research projects that may have a commercial use

By FRED O. WILLIAMS
News Business Reporter

Buffalo's bioinformatics center signed up a new corporate partner Monday, one with capital and business ties that will help transform lab research into job-generating products, officials said.

Tata Consultancy Services, an infotech giant based in Mumbai, India, signed a research sharing partnership with UB in a ceremony Monday. It also announced the opening of a regional office in downtown Buffalo.

"TCS is an international powerhouse in the area of consulting and information technology," Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton said at the ceremony at the Hyatt. "I think this will lead to more jobs and investment here in Buffalo."

Sen. Clinton introduced the company to upstate New York in a tour last summer.

The high-powered announcement also drew Subramaniam Ramadorai, TCS' chief executive officer; Nobel laureate Herbert Hauptman, of the Hauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute, and Buffalo Mayor Anthony Masiello.

But local competitors fear TCS could end up exporting computer tasks to India, where wages for programmers are lower.

"If they pay half what we're paying, they're in a much better position," said John Gibson, president of Computer Consulting Services of Western New York, a 30-person firm in Amherst. "Labor cost is the largest portion of our business." Gibson's firm helps companies build computer systems to manage business data.

TCS has drawn criticism for employing non-citizens with temporary work visas in the U.S., as well as for exporting software development tasks to India. The company has 5,000 employees in North America, about one-quarter of its total employment.

Company officials said TCS will be a corporate citizen of Western New York and an engine of growth here.

"When TCS comes to a community we must belong to the community, participate in the activities of the community," chief executive Ramadorai said.

The company - whose clients include drug makers Eli Lilly Co. and Johnson & Johnson - will look to UB for research projects that can be turned to commercial use, such as drug development tools.

"Research for the sake of research is not something we look at," Ramadorai said.

TCS has formed partnerships with 18 universities including Carnegie Mellon in Pittsburgh, the University of Southern California, Riverside, Calif., and the University of Wisconsin in Milwaukee.

Under the agreement, TCS may support research projects at UB in return for rights to commercialize the results, vice provost Bruce Holm said. License agreements for specific technology will ensure that Buffalo and New York state get a share of the work, he said.

The university is working on similar, non-exclusive agreements with other companies in Ireland and France, Holm said.

Headquartered in Mumbai, formerly called Bombay, TCS has annual sales of $880 million and 20,140 global employees. Its North American operations have 50 offices and generate more than 65 percent of total sales. TCS is part of India's Tata Group, a conglomerate of 80 companies in industries from auto components to cell phone networks.

We Are Winning in New Hampshire

Like Perseus with his mirror and lance we shall strike down the Medusa of the New World Order. Bartcop is still solidly pro-Hillary, so if you as liberal want to expiate on the calumnies of this Bush-Clinton cabel, email him at bartcop-feedback@bartcop.com. Below is an excerpted article from ChronWatch

Dems Hate Hillary More than Bush
Written by Gregory Borse
Tuesday, August 08, 2006

Who do the Democrats of New Hampshire hate more than Bush? Why, Hillary Clinton, of course.

The Boston Herald has run a story, by Business Columnist Brett Arends (go here), about focus-group polling among Democrats in New Hampshire that sheds light on a curious phenomenon from outside the Washington D.C. bubble. It seems that a very real antipathy for Hillary Clinton is growing among grassroots Democrats and that it has thus far gone largely unremarked among the party elite.



The folks at the Daily Kos were abuzz about the numbers yesterday-- go here, see 2008: Hillary Hate in New Hampshire. And many of them agreed with the “vitriol” spewed against Ms. Clinton by Dems in New Hampshire.

One Kossack, “Eugene,” put it this way:

Until the last few years many of us felt supportive of her. We rejected the right-wing smears.

And how did she repay us? By cozying up to Bush and the same right wing. Arguing we need to rethink our strong stance on abortion rights. Wasting time worrying about violent video games instead of violent Republican government. Her transparent attempts at appeasing the right led many of us to believe she was indeed Machiavellian, power-mad, utterly untrustworthy.

If she were to merely remain Senator, this level of vitriol would not exist. But she clearly seeks the presidency, and the vast majority of us DO NOT want her to be that. It's the combination then of her play for the presidency and her selling out of our basic core values that creates this disdain.

And yeah, her handlers and the beltway Dems are deeply deluded if they think this can be overcome. Hillary is the dictionary definition of unelectable.




*********************************


We will not fooled by another puppet for the Carlyle Group. The tide is turning. The liberal base is letting its voice be heard by a ferocious roar. In the name of all that is holy, I rebuke you, Hillary!